ABSTRACT
Background: Most in-person classes are being held via virtual platforms, and bedside education has faced serious challenges during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study evaluated the Iranian medical students' point of view regarding the virtual classes and length of education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We designed a cross-sectional study using convenience sampling about 6 months after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. We formulated 4 questions regarding their satisfaction with infrastructures and contents of virtual classes, length of education, and their perspectives on how clinical and practical education should continue during the COVID-19 pandemic. We designed an online questionnaire and sent it to medical students all over the nation using virtual platforms and groups in social media. The attained data have been coded and analyzed with SPSS version 22 using descriptive and analytic tests. Results: A total of 1999 medical students participated in the study, and most students were from type 1 universities (50.4%) and were in the clerkship stage (33.3%) of education. Medical interns (mean = 3.34 [SD = 1.29]) were most satisfied with the infrastructures of virtual classes compared with students in basic sciences (mean = 2.93 [SD = 1.18]), physiopathology (mean = 2.62 [SD = 1.26]), and clerkship (mean = 2.56 [SD = 1.31]) stages (P < 0.001). Also, students in type 1 and the nongovernmental (NG) type universities were significantly more satisfied with the content, with mean scores of 2.94 and 3.14, respectively, and infrastructures, with mean scores of 2.77 and 2.98, respectively, of virtual classes than students in type 2, with mean scores of 2.59 and 2.42, respectively, and 3 universities, with mean scores of 2.54 and 2.34, respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Infrastructure is a crucial component in virtual learning, and it can also affect satisfaction with the provided virtual content. Also, providing better clinical content should be performed for medical students before their internship during the current pandemic situation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUNDS: Healthcare workers are at risk of mental illness during COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated the level of perceived risk and adherence to preventive behaviors regarding COVID-19 among medical students and physicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an online nationwide cross-sectional survey among Iranian physicians and medical students. We collected data regarding perceived risk, perceived stress scale (P·S·S.), attitude, practice, and information sources. We assessed the association of four main outcomes (risk perception, P·S.S. score, attitude, and practice) with demographic variables. RESULTS: A total of 1085 participants with an overall fear score of 6.48 ± 2.29 out of 10 filled the questionnaires. Older and more educated participants had a higher risk perception level and adherence to protective measures. In contrary, participants in lower-risk workplaces had lower risk perception scores. Main sources of information did not affect the scores of risk perception, P·S·S., and practice. Higher risk perception scores were observed in those with higher practice and P·S.S. scores.Contrary to risk perception, the P·S.S. score was not affected by many of the demographic variables, except gender. The most positive attitude was observed in individuals with a higher level of trust in governmental information sources. Participants with higher P·S.S. scores adhered more to protective measures. CONCLUSION: Risk perception had the greatest impact on adherence to preventive behaviors. Therefore, policymakers should consider perceived risk as a predictor of the extension of the pandemic. Both risk perception and P·S.S. reflect the severity of fear from COVID-19; however, P·S.S. is less affected by sociodemographic and workplace characteristics.